How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from CoffeeScript to COBOL in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your CoffeeScript code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting COBOL code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from CoffeeScript to COBOL using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
CoffeeScript
COBOL
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
CoffeeScript
COBOL
Key differences between CoffeeScript and COBOL
Characteristic | CoffeeScript | COBOL |
---|---|---|
Syntax | CoffeeScript has a more concise and expressive syntax compared to COBOL. | COBOL has a verbose and rigid syntax compared to CoffeeScript. |
Paradigm | CoffeeScript is a multi-paradigm language that supports both functional and object-oriented programming. | COBOL is primarily a procedural programming language. |
Typing | CoffeeScript is dynamically typed. | COBOL is statically typed. |
Performance | CoffeeScript is generally slower in terms of performance compared to COBOL. | COBOL is known for its efficient and high-performance execution. |
Libraries and frameworks | CoffeeScript has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and frameworks compared to COBOL. | COBOL has a limited selection of libraries and frameworks. |
Community and support | CoffeeScript has a smaller community and less active support compared to COBOL. | COBOL has a larger community and more established support. |
Learning curve | CoffeeScript has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with JavaScript. | COBOL has a steep learning curve, especially for developers without prior experience in mainframe programming. |