How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Erlang to Racket in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Erlang code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Racket code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Erlang and Racket
Characteristic | Erlang | Racket |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Erlang has a unique syntax that is based on Prolog and uses pattern matching extensively. | Racket has a syntax that is similar to Scheme and is known for its simplicity and expressiveness. |
Paradigm | Erlang is a concurrent, functional programming language that is designed for building scalable and fault-tolerant systems. | Racket is a multi-paradigm programming language that supports functional, imperative, and object-oriented programming. |
Typing | Erlang is dynamically typed, which means that variable types are checked at runtime. | Racket is dynamically typed, but also supports optional static typing through the Typed Racket extension. |
Performance | Erlang is known for its excellent performance in handling concurrent and distributed systems. | Racket is not specifically optimized for performance and may not be the best choice for computationally intensive tasks. |
Libraries and frameworks | Erlang has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks for building distributed and fault-tolerant systems, such as OTP (Open Telecom Platform). | Racket has a comprehensive collection of libraries and frameworks for various purposes, including web development, GUI programming, and more. |
Community and support | Erlang has a strong and active community with good support from the language creators and the community itself. | Racket has a smaller but dedicated community with good support from the language creators and the community. |
Learning curve | Erlang has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers who are new to functional programming and pattern matching. | Racket has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers who are familiar with Lisp-like languages. |