How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Ada to OCaml in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Ada code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting OCaml code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Ada to OCaml using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Ada
OCaml
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Ada
OCaml
Key differences between Ada and OCaml
Characteristic | Ada | OCaml |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Ada has a more verbose syntax compared to OCaml. | OCaml has a more concise and expressive syntax compared to Ada. |
Paradigm | Ada supports imperative, object-oriented, and concurrent programming paradigms. | OCaml supports functional, imperative, and object-oriented programming paradigms. |
Typing | Ada has strong static typing with type inference. | OCaml has strong static typing with type inference. |
Performance | Ada is known for its high performance and efficiency. | OCaml is generally considered to have good performance, but may not be as efficient as Ada in certain cases. |
Libraries and frameworks | Ada has a rich set of libraries and frameworks for various domains. | OCaml has a growing ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, but may not have as extensive coverage as Ada. |
Community and support | Ada has a smaller community compared to OCaml, but still has active support and resources. | OCaml has a larger and more active community with extensive support and resources. |
Learning curve | Ada has a steeper learning curve compared to OCaml due to its more complex syntax and stricter typing. | OCaml has a relatively moderate learning curve, especially for programmers familiar with functional programming. |