How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Elixir to Haskell in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Elixir code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Haskell code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Elixir and Haskell
Characteristic | Elixir | Haskell |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Elixir has a Ruby-like syntax with a focus on simplicity and readability. | Haskell has a unique syntax that is based on mathematical notation and is known for its strong type system. |
Paradigm | Elixir is a functional programming language that also supports concurrent and distributed programming. | Haskell is a purely functional programming language that emphasizes immutability and referential transparency. |
Typing | Elixir is dynamically typed, meaning that variable types are checked at runtime. | Haskell is statically typed, meaning that variable types are checked at compile time. |
Performance | Elixir is known for its high performance and scalability, thanks to its underlying Erlang virtual machine (BEAM). | Haskell is known for its efficient and optimized code, but it may require more effort to achieve high performance compared to Elixir. |
Libraries and frameworks | Elixir has a growing ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, including Phoenix for web development. | Haskell has a rich collection of libraries and frameworks, such as Yesod and Scotty, but the ecosystem may be smaller compared to Elixir. |
Community and support | Elixir has a vibrant and supportive community with active forums, meetups, and online resources. | Haskell has a dedicated community with active forums, mailing lists, and online resources, but it may be smaller compared to Elixir. |
Learning curve | Elixir has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for developers familiar with Ruby or other dynamic languages. | Haskell has a steeper learning curve due to its strong type system and functional programming concepts, but it can lead to a deeper understanding of programming. |