How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Fsharp to Haskell in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Fsharp code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Haskell code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Fsharp to Haskell using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Fsharp
Haskell
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Fsharp
Haskell
Key differences between Fsharp and Haskell
Characteristic | Fsharp | Haskell |
---|---|---|
Syntax | F# has a syntax similar to OCaml and is inspired by ML languages. It uses indentation for block structure and has a concise and expressive syntax. | Haskell has a unique syntax that is based on mathematical notation. It uses indentation for block structure and has a strong focus on functional programming concepts. |
Paradigm | F# is a multi-paradigm language that supports functional programming, object-oriented programming, and imperative programming. | Haskell is a purely functional programming language that emphasizes immutability and referential transparency. |
Typing | F# is a statically typed language that supports type inference. It has a strong type system that helps catch errors at compile-time. | Haskell is a statically typed language that also supports type inference. It has a sophisticated type system that allows for advanced type-level programming. |
Performance | F# is known for its performance and can be as fast as C# due to its integration with the .NET runtime. | Haskell's performance can be comparable to other compiled languages, but it may require optimization techniques for certain use cases. |
Libraries and frameworks | F# has good interoperability with .NET libraries and frameworks, which provides access to a wide range of existing tools and resources. | Haskell has a growing ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, but it may not have as extensive support as some other languages. |
Community and support | F# has an active and supportive community with resources, forums, and libraries available. It is backed by Microsoft and has good tooling support. | Haskell has a passionate community, but it may not have as large of a user base or as extensive commercial support as some other languages. |
Learning curve | F# has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers familiar with C# or other .NET languages. It may require some adjustment to functional programming concepts. | Haskell has a steep learning curve, especially for developers new to functional programming. It requires understanding of advanced concepts like monads and type classes. |