How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Haskell to OCaml in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Haskell code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting OCaml code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Haskell to OCaml using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Haskell
OCaml
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Haskell
OCaml
Key differences between Haskell and OCaml
Characteristic | Haskell | OCaml |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Haskell has a more complex and expressive syntax compared to OCaml. It uses indentation to define blocks of code and has a strong focus on functional programming concepts. | OCaml has a simpler and more traditional syntax compared to Haskell. It uses curly braces to define blocks of code and supports both functional and imperative programming styles. |
Paradigm | Haskell is a purely functional programming language, which means it emphasizes immutability and avoids side effects. It also supports lazy evaluation. | OCaml is a multi-paradigm programming language that supports both functional and imperative programming styles. It allows mutable state and supports eager evaluation. |
Typing | Haskell has a strong static type system that enforces type safety and provides type inference. It also supports type classes and parametric polymorphism. | OCaml has a strong static type system that enforces type safety and provides type inference. It also supports parametric polymorphism and variant types. |
Performance | Haskell is known for its high-level abstractions and lazy evaluation, which can sometimes result in slower performance compared to OCaml. However, with proper optimization, Haskell can achieve comparable performance. | OCaml is known for its efficient execution and can often achieve better performance compared to Haskell. It has a more imperative execution model and supports mutable state. |
Libraries and frameworks | Haskell has a growing ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, although it may not have as many options as some other languages. It has strong support for functional programming libraries. | OCaml has a mature ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, with a focus on systems programming and compiler development. It has good support for both functional and imperative programming libraries. |
Community and support | Haskell has a passionate and active community, with many online resources, forums, and libraries available. It also has strong academic and research support. | OCaml has a dedicated community, with active development and support. It has a strong presence in the academic and research communities, as well as industry applications. |
Learning curve | Haskell has a steep learning curve, especially for programmers who are new to functional programming concepts. It requires understanding of advanced type system features and functional programming principles. | OCaml has a moderate learning curve, especially for programmers familiar with imperative programming languages. It has a more traditional syntax and supports both functional and imperative programming styles. |