How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Lisp to COBOL in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Lisp code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting COBOL code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Lisp to COBOL using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Lisp
COBOL
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Lisp
COBOL
Key differences between Lisp and COBOL
Characteristic | Lisp | COBOL |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Lisp has a prefix notation syntax, which means that operators are placed before their operands. | COBOL has a more traditional syntax, with operators placed between operands. |
Paradigm | Lisp is a functional programming language that supports procedural and object-oriented programming paradigms. | COBOL is primarily a procedural programming language. |
Typing | Lisp is dynamically typed, meaning that variable types are determined at runtime. | COBOL is statically typed, meaning that variable types are determined at compile-time. |
Performance | Lisp is known for its flexibility and expressiveness, but it may not be as performant as some other languages. | COBOL is designed for efficient processing of large-scale business applications. |
Libraries and frameworks | Lisp has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, particularly for artificial intelligence and symbolic computation. | COBOL has a more limited selection of libraries and frameworks, primarily focused on business applications. |
Community and support | Lisp has a smaller but dedicated community with active support from enthusiasts. | COBOL has a large community and extensive support, particularly in the enterprise and government sectors. |
Learning curve | Lisp has a steep learning curve due to its unique syntax and functional programming concepts. | COBOL has a relatively low learning curve, especially for programmers with a background in procedural languages. |