How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Lisp to Haskell in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Lisp code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Haskell code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Lisp to Haskell using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Lisp
Haskell
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Lisp
Haskell
Key differences between Lisp and Haskell
Characteristic | Lisp | Haskell |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Lisp has a prefix notation syntax, which can be challenging for beginners. It uses parentheses extensively for function calls and expressions. | Haskell has a more traditional infix notation syntax, which is easier to read and understand. It uses indentation to define blocks of code. |
Paradigm | Lisp is a multi-paradigm language that supports functional programming, procedural programming, and object-oriented programming. | Haskell is a purely functional programming language that emphasizes immutability and referential transparency. |
Typing | Lisp is dynamically typed, meaning that variable types are determined at runtime. | Haskell is statically typed, meaning that variable types are checked at compile-time. |
Performance | Lisp can be slower than other languages due to its dynamic nature and extensive use of lists. | Haskell is known for its strong performance, thanks to its lazy evaluation and advanced optimization techniques. |
Libraries and frameworks | Lisp has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, but it may not have as many options as more popular languages. | Haskell has a growing collection of libraries and frameworks, with a focus on functional programming and type safety. |
Community and support | Lisp has a dedicated community of enthusiasts and researchers, but it may not have as large a user base as mainstream languages. | Haskell has a strong and active community, with many resources and support available online. |
Learning curve | Lisp has a steep learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its unique syntax and concepts. | Haskell has a steep learning curve, especially for programmers without prior experience with functional programming. |