How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Racket to Lisp in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Racket code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Lisp code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Racket and Lisp
Characteristic | Racket | Lisp |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Racket has a more modern and expressive syntax compared to Lisp. | Lisp has a simpler and more minimalistic syntax compared to Racket. |
Paradigm | Racket supports multiple programming paradigms, including functional programming, imperative programming, and object-oriented programming. | Lisp is primarily a functional programming language, although it also supports imperative programming. |
Typing | Racket is a dynamically typed language, meaning that variable types are checked at runtime. | Lisp is dynamically typed, similar to Racket. |
Performance | Racket has a reputation for being slower in terms of performance compared to some other programming languages. | Lisp's performance can vary depending on the implementation, but it generally performs well. |
Libraries and frameworks | Racket has a rich set of libraries and frameworks available, including a powerful standard library and a package manager for easy installation of third-party libraries. | Lisp also has a variety of libraries and frameworks available, although the ecosystem may not be as extensive as Racket's. |
Community and support | Racket has a dedicated and active community, with good documentation and support available. | Lisp also has a supportive community, although it may not be as large or active as Racket's. |
Learning curve | Racket has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its clear and consistent syntax and extensive documentation. | Lisp has a steeper learning curve compared to Racket, mainly because of its minimalistic syntax and different programming paradigm. |