How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Racket to Scala in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Racket code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Scala code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Racket and Scala
Characteristic | Racket | Scala |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Racket has a Lisp-like syntax with a strong emphasis on parentheses and prefix notation. | Scala has a syntax that combines object-oriented and functional programming concepts, with a more traditional curly brace syntax. |
Paradigm | Racket is a multi-paradigm language that supports functional programming, imperative programming, and object-oriented programming. | Scala is a multi-paradigm language that combines object-oriented programming and functional programming. |
Typing | Racket is a dynamically typed language, which means that variable types are checked at runtime. | Scala is a statically typed language, which means that variable types are checked at compile-time. |
Performance | Racket is an interpreted language, which can result in slower performance compared to compiled languages. | Scala is a compiled language, which can result in faster performance compared to interpreted languages. |
Libraries and frameworks | Racket has a rich set of libraries and frameworks available, particularly for academic and research purposes. | Scala has a wide range of libraries and frameworks available, including popular ones like Akka and Play Framework. |
Community and support | Racket has a smaller community compared to some other languages, but it has dedicated support from the Racket development team. | Scala has a large and active community, with strong support from the Scala Center and various online forums. |
Learning curve | Racket has a relatively gentle learning curve, particularly for beginners with a background in functional programming. | Scala has a steeper learning curve, especially for beginners without prior experience in functional programming. |