How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Scheme to Haskell in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Scheme code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Haskell code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Scheme and Haskell
Characteristic | Scheme | Haskell |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Scheme has a simple and minimalist syntax, with a heavy use of parentheses and prefix notation. | Haskell has a more complex syntax compared to Scheme, with a mix of infix and prefix notation. |
Paradigm | Scheme is a multi-paradigm language, supporting both functional and imperative programming. | Haskell is a purely functional language, focusing on functional programming paradigms. |
Typing | Scheme is dynamically typed, allowing for flexible and dynamic programming. | Haskell is statically typed, providing strong type checking and compile-time guarantees. |
Performance | Scheme is generally considered to have good performance, but it can be slower than languages with more optimized compilers. | Haskell is known for its strong performance, thanks to its advanced compiler optimizations. |
Libraries and frameworks | Scheme has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and frameworks compared to Haskell. | Haskell has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, making it easier to find existing solutions for various tasks. |
Community and support | Scheme has a smaller community compared to Haskell, but it still has active users and support. | Haskell has a vibrant and active community, with extensive support and resources available. |
Learning curve | Scheme has a relatively low learning curve, especially for programmers familiar with Lisp-like languages. | Haskell has a steeper learning curve, requiring a deeper understanding of functional programming concepts. |